Is Continuous Integration being practiced? With that context, let's proceed to determine whether the constituent components are present. But if the question is whether this can be considered CI/CD, we can proceed on the lowest common denominator / bare minimum of popular/accepted definitions and apply those definitions liberally as they relate to the principles of CI/CD. We'll need some definitions for CI and CD (see above link), which may vary by opinion. Easy enough: if your (automated) process is practicing both CI (continuous integration) and CD (continuous deployment), then we can consider the solution as being some form of "CI/CD". Beforehand, let's establish what can be considered "CI/CD". Continuous Deploymentįor example, if I make a simple tool that automatically builds and deploys, but test step is manual - can this be considered CI/CD? For additional context, see: Continuous Integration vs. For the sake of this question, we'll accept the two terms as relatively interchangeable - but be aware that others may apply a more narrow definition, which may be slightly different depending on which "D" you mean, specifically. There's a minor point of minutia that should be mentioned first: the "D" in "CI/CD" can either mean "Delivery" or "Deployment". WorkflowScript: 1: unable to resolve class line 1, column 26.Īt .ErrorCollector.failIfErrors(ErrorCollector.java:310)Īt .CompilationUnit.applyToSourceUnits(CompilationUnit.java:958)Īt .CompilationUnit.doPhaseOperation(CompilationUnit.java:605)Īt .pile(CompilationUnit.java:554)Īt 圜lassLoader.doParseClass(Groov圜lassLoader.java:298)Īt 圜lassLoader.parseClass(Groov圜lassLoader.java:268)Īt (GroovyShell.java:688)Īt (GroovyShell.java:700)Īt .(CpsGroovyShell.java:142)Īt .(CpsGroovyShell.java:127)Īt .(CpsFlowExecution.java:571)Īt .(CpsFlowExecution.java:523)Īt .(WorkflowRun.java:334)Īt (ResourceController.java:99)Īt (Executor.java:432) MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed: So let's get our hands dirty and create a ArgoCD AppProject using the argocd CLI called apps2deploy: role token:ġ.) Use argocd CLI to create AppProject, role & permissions incl. There are 2 solutions how to configure the AppProject, role & permissions incl. For example, a CI system may only be able to sync a single app (but not change its source or destination). These can be used to give a CI pipeline a restricted set of permissions. Projects include a feature called roles that enable automated access to a project's applications. ArgoCD projects have the ability to define Project roles: And with such a AppProject you don't even need to create a user like tekton in the ConfigMap argocd-cm. When you create local users, each of those users will need additional RBAC rules set up, otherwise they will fall back to the default policy specified by fault field of the argocd-rbac-cm ConfigMap.īut these additional RBAC rules could be setup the simplest using ArgoCD Projects. The problem is mentioned in Argo's useraccounts docs: Or perhaps the article is suggesting the repo is dedicated only to Terraform. These don't require provisioning new infrastructure, as the code is just placed onto existing infrastructure. For example, this article says "anytime there is a push to the src directory it will kick off the action which will have Terraform deploy the changes made to your website."īut doesn't this only make sense if the change you are making is related to provisioning infrastructure? Why would you want any code push to trigger a Terraform job if most pushes to the codecase have nothing to do with provisioning new infrastrucutre? Aren't most code pushes things like changing some CSS on the website, or adding a function to a back-end node script. It makes sense that anytime one wants to provision something different in their infrastructure that a CI/CD pipeline would add visibility and repeatability to an otherwise manual process.īut some article make it sound as though Terraform is doing the deploying of any change. You see a lot of articles on combining GitHub actions with Terraform.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |